Tue Apr 25, 2017 London
X

What is Lorem Ipsum?
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.

Why do we use it?
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for 'lorem ipsum' will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

Where can I get some?
There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which don't look even slightly believable. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn't anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary, making this the first true generator on the Internet. It uses a dictionary of over 200 Latin words, combined with a handful of model sentence structures, to generate Lorem Ipsum which looks reasonable. The generated Lorem Ipsum is therefore always free from repetition, injected humour, or non-characteristic words etc.

THE FOG

The economy, politics and current affairs Money, power and its guiding forces

All Hail Hale

Lady Hale speaks utter sense on Article 50 and Brexit

 

Lady Hale is far from perfect. She supported the super-injunction that keeps the antics of the titleless spouse of a loathesome gay pop singer in an olive oil filled paddling pool out of the media but in comments this week, she spoke utter sense.

 

Speaking ahead of the appeal hearing against Gina Miller’s successful challenge to Article 50, Baroness Hale stated that it is of “fundamental constitutional importance” and added: “As is well known, the referendum on whether the United Kingdom should leave or remain in the European Union produced a majority of 51.8 per cent in favour of leaving. But that referendum was not legally binding on Parliament”.

 

She continued: “Perhaps significantly, the Government has given up the argument that the issue is not justiciable in our courts” and thus annoyed the likes of the Daily Mail’s Stephen Glover. In response, he ranted: “She is presumably proud of what she said. I don’t believe she should be. In fact, it seems to me that her speech raises questions about impartiality. The timing of her intervention betrays poor judgment”.

 

“For Justice Hale has effectively thrown a boulder into the pond which cannot be removed”.

 

We hope Lady Hale throws a few more boulders and that others follow her lead.

 

Comments

2 comments on “All Hail Hale”

  1. Hale, a Supreme Court judge, opines on a matter about to come before the Court; and worse, does so in Kuala Lumpur.
    No wonder the general populace have a low opinion of the judiciary

  2. I quite agree Peter. Just another example of the arrogance of the the Political Elite of which so many of the so called judges are a part, which is why no action will ever be taken on child abuse involving any of them.

    It is all very fine for these arrogant people to appear to take the high moral ground on this matter, but here is the test. Ask yourself if the referendum had gone the other way whether they would have done the same thing.

    Of course not, suddenly the much acclaimed impartiality would be nowhere to be found.

    I rest my case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *